Discussion:
A federal judge just dealt the gun lobby a devastating defeat on assault rifle bans
Add Reply
wolfbat359
2018-04-07 11:44:42 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
https://washingtonpress.com/2018/04/06/a-federal-judge-just-dealt-the-gun-lobby-a-devastating-defeat-on-assault-rifle-bans/



A federal court today upheld the right of a state to ban military-style semi-automatic guns and assault rifles like those used in the mass murders in Connecticut, Colorado, Nevada, Florida and elsewhere.

The U.S. District Court ruled that Massachusetts ban on assault weapons and large magazines of ammunition put in place in 1998 are legal because those high capacity guns and rifles fall outside of the “scope of the personal right to ‘bear arms’ under the Second Amendment” of the U.S. Constitution.

U.S. District Judge William Young also upheld Democratic Attorney General Maura Healey’s enforcement notice to gun sellers and manufacturers clarifying what constitutes a ‘‘copy’’ or ‘‘duplicate’’ weapon under the 1998 law, reports The Associated Press.

The ruling was in response to a lawsuit filed last year by the Gun Owners Action League of Massachusetts and others groups who claimed that the Massachusetts law infringed on their Second Amendment rights.

“The AR-15 and its analogs,” wrote the judge, “along with large capacity magazines, are simply not weapons within the original meaning of the individual constitutional right to ‘bear arms.'”


So the elected representatives in any state have the right to ban such weapons, just as other states have the right to allow them, added the judge .... (cont)
me
2018-04-07 15:01:54 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Interpretations are like assholes...

The fundamental problem is other interpretations can ignore or resist this one. Keep your eyes on the Lulu issue unfolding now in Brazil where one group’s criminal is another group’s hero.
mg
2018-04-08 05:22:53 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
On Sat, 7 Apr 2018 04:44:42 -0700 (PDT), wolfbat359
Post by wolfbat359
https://washingtonpress.com/2018/04/06/a-federal-judge-just-dealt-the-gun-lobby-a-devastating-defeat-on-assault-rifle-bans/
A federal court today upheld the right of a state to ban military-style semi-automatic guns and assault rifles like those used in the mass murders in Connecticut, Colorado, Nevada, Florida and elsewhere.
The U.S. District Court ruled that Massachusetts ban on assault weapons and large magazines of ammunition put in place in 1998 are legal because those high capacity guns and rifles fall outside of the “scope of the personal right to ‘bear arms’ under the Second Amendment” of the U.S. Constitution.
U.S. District Judge William Young also upheld Democratic Attorney General Maura Healey’s enforcement notice to gun sellers and manufacturers clarifying what constitutes a ‘‘copy’’ or ‘‘duplicate’’ weapon under the 1998 law, reports The Associated Press.
The ruling was in response to a lawsuit filed last year by the Gun Owners Action League of Massachusetts and others groups who claimed that the Massachusetts law infringed on their Second Amendment rights.
“The AR-15 and its analogs,” wrote the judge, “along with large capacity magazines, are simply not weapons within the original meaning of the individual constitutional right to ‘bear arms.'”
So the elected representatives in any state have the right to ban such weapons, just as other states have the right to allow them, added the judge .... (cont)
Massachusetts is one of the most liberal states in the union, but they
evidently don't ban semi-automatic pistols. What's up with that? I
don't understand it. Here are some semi-automatics that are
massachusetts compliant, for instance:
https://www.budsgunshop.com/catalog/product_info.php/products_id/84068/Firearms/Handguns/Smith+%26+Wesson/S%26W+Pistols/Smith+%26+Wesson+180051+M%26P+Shield+%2AMa+Approved%2A+9mm+3.1+8%2B1
Loading...