You voted for Trump because ....
Add Reply
Mr. Black
2018-02-11 05:31:59 UTC
Raw Message
The 5 biggest Trump-Russia events to watch for in 2018
Yes, one of them is indicting Donald Trump.

By Alex ***@AlexWardVoxalex.ward@vox.com Jan 2, 2018, 8:30am EST

Win McNamee/Getty Images
President Trump spent 2017 trying to bat back accusations that his
campaign colluded with Russia. But 2018 could be even worse, with
potential indictments of Trump's closest aides — and possibly the
president himself.

Mueller could learn new information about possible collusion from Trump’s
former campaign Chair Paul Manafort or former national security adviser
Michael Flynn, two men Mueller charged with crimes (Manafort pleaded not
guilty, but Flynn pleaded guilty). The special counsel could indict even
more people in Trump’s orbit, including his son-in-law and special adviser
Jared Kushner.

Or even worse for Trump, Mueller could charge him with obstruction of
justice based on his firing of former FBI director James Comey in May 2017
after Comey declined to stop an investigation into Flynn.

Trump, for his part, could escalate things by firing Mueller or deputy
attorney general Rod Rosenstein for not removing the special counsel on
Trump’s behalf. Either move could trigger a historic political crisis —
and fuel calls for Trump’s impeachment.

So what follows are the key things to watch for in the Trump-Russia
investigation in 2018. Depending on how they play out, the president — and
the country — may face an even bigger legal and political crisis than in

Will Trump fire Mueller?

The top question of 2017 will likely remain the top question of 2018.
That’s because Mueller’s probe is drawing closer to Trump’s top aides —
and to Trump himself.

Last October, two of Trump’s former campaign aides were indicted, and a
third pleaded guilty on false statement charges. Then, on December 1,
Flynn pleaded guilty to a false statements charge, and made a deal to
cooperate with Mueller’s team in the process (more on that in a bit).

The president has repeatedly complained about the investigation both in
public and in private, and some of his conservative allies in and out of
government are already making the case to fire the special counsel. So
there is a chance that Mueller is dismissed this year.

But “firing Mueller” isn’t so simple. To get rid of Mueller, Trump would
also have to get rid of Rosenstein. Rosenstein, who is effectively
Mueller’s boss, has repeatedly made it clear that he sees no good cause to
fire Mueller. So to get to Mueller, Trump could ask Rosenstein to fire
Mueller, which may cause Rosenstein to resign instead of doing the deed.
Or Trump could simply fire Rosenstein.

So if Trump does want to remove the special counsel, he may need to go
through several Justice Department officials until he finds one willing to
carry out his order.

That would get very messy very quickly. A fight on Capitol Hill would
almost surely break out between liberals claiming Trump obstructed justice
and conservatives suggesting Trump was right to dismiss Mueller.

For now, Trump insists he has no intention of firing Mueller, but that
could change next year as the special counsel moves further into Trump’s
inner circle.

Which leads to another question ...

Will Jared Kushner get indicted?

On December 1, Mueller released a court document that described a “very
senior” transition official asking Flynn to persuade the Russian
ambassador to the US to help stop a UN Security Council vote on Israeli
settlement policy.

Multiple reports confirmed that the official was Kushner. That makes
perfect sense: Kushner was an extremely important figure during the
transition, and reporting at the time suggested that he was involved in
Trump team deliberations on the settlements issue.

That was just one of many times Kushner’s name has come up in connection
with the Russia matter. There was the meeting he had with ambassador
Kislyak during the transition in which they reportedly discussed setting
up a secret backchannel of communication. There was the Donald Trump Jr.-
brokered meeting with a Russian lawyer who’d promised “dirt” on Hillary
Clinton during the campaign. And there are the reports that Kushner urged
Trump to fire then-FBI director James Comey.

Kushner also amended his financial disclosure forms at least 39 times.
Those forms are important: They are needed for Kushner to get a security
clearance. Vox’s Zeeshan Aleem reported that Kushner originally failed to
report the Trump campaign’s communications with Russia; his meetings with
Russians; his business ties with Russians; and more. On top of that,
Kushner used a private email account to conduct government business.

One of the people Mueller hopes will provide more information on Kushner
is Flynn, and Flynn may just be willing to cooperate ...

What, exactly, is Flynn giving Mueller?

Flynn’s plea deal was the most significant moment in Mueller’s probe last

Flynn was the first person who had actually served in the Trump White
House to admit he broke the law. And he wasn’t just any old official: His
role as national security adviser made him one of the most powerful people
in the administration. The retired three-star general temporarily had
enormous sway over Trump’s early policy and personnel choices.

Due to his unique ties to both the Trump campaign and the Trump White
House, Flynn is particularly well-suited to answer the two central
questions in the Mueller probe: Did the Trump campaign knowingly collude
with Russia, and did Trump obstruct justice by trying to limit or derail
the FBI’s investigation?

So far there is no public evidence that Flynn has provided Mueller any
valuable information. But some legal experts believe Mueller is using
Flynn to get closer to the president.

“We know from public reports that Flynn has a ton of criminal exposure,
and yet he’s pleading guilty to a relatively minor crime. I’m confident
Flynn is singing like a bird to Mueller,” Andy Wright, a law professor at
Savannah Law School, told Vox’s Sean Illing.

That could be very bad news for Kushner, for instance, and maybe even the
president further down the line. Their fortunes might worsen if someone
else turns on them ...

Does Paul Manafort flip?

Mueller indicted former Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort and his
business associate Rick Gates — two top Trump staffers during the 2016
campaign — in federal court last year.

The two men now face a total of 12 charges that mostly focus on alleged
money laundering, failure to disclose their financial assets, and false
statements regarding their work for the government of Ukraine and a
Ukrainian political party.

The indictment alleges that Manafort laundered more than $18 million since
2006. However, the charges don’t actually have anything to do with the
question of Russian interference during the election. Manafort and Gates
pleaded “not guilty” to the charges.

Still, going after Manafort has its own logic for Mueller’s probe. First,
the charges could get Manafort to admit he played a role in, or knew
about, any potential collusion between Trump’s team and the Russian
government during the campaign.

And second, if Manafort does have any useful information, perhaps
Mueller’s team could convince or compel him to share that information —
maybe because of these other charges.

Manafort may instead choose not to give up any incriminating information
about Trump or people close to him — if he has any — perhaps in hopes of a
presidential pardon. But Politico reported in August 2017 that Mueller’s
team started working with New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman, who
had been conducting his own investigation of Manafort’s finances.

That’s important: President Trump could theoretically pardon Manafort for
any federal offense — but not state offenses. So as long as the prospect
of state charges are hanging over Manafort’s head, he could well have a
powerful incentive to cooperate.

Does Trump get charged with obstruction of justice?

This is one of the biggest questions hanging above the entire Mueller
probe, and it may yet take years to find out one way or the other.

But bits and pieces keep coming out that brings this question back to the
forefront. On December 2, for example, Trump tweeted the following:

Recall that Trump fired Flynn on February 13, 2017. It was that very
morning when Trump cleared a room of advisers and asked to speak with
Comey alone. “I hope you can see your way clear to letting this go, to
letting Flynn go,” Trump said, according to Comey’s later testimony and a
memo he wrote at the time.

Comey said that he “understood the President to be requesting that we drop
any investigation of Flynn in connection with false statements about his
conversations with the Russian ambassador in December.” Trump denies ever
saying this.

Trump’s own tweet suggests that he was well aware Flynn was facing serious
legal jeopardy — and went straight to the head of the FBI to ask him to
back off.

Trump’s outreach to Comey already looked bad. But Trump’s interference
looks even worse if, as the tweet says, he knew not only that Flynn was
under investigation but that he outright “lied to” the FBI. At that point
he wouldn’t just be trying to protect an ex-aide who he thinks did nothing
wrong — he’d be trying to argue that a guilty man shouldn’t face justice.

The White House, however, claims that one of Trump’s lawyers — John Dowd —
actually tweeted the message, not Trump.

Still, the tweet is an indicator that Trump may have obstructed justice
when he fired Comey. Ironically, that move led to Mueller’s appointment as
the special counsel. Any legal trouble that may come Trump’s way in 2018
will largely stem from the president’s blunders.