Discussion:
Google Was "Working To Get Hillary Clinton Elected"
Add Reply
me
2018-09-11 14:01:08 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-09-10/google-was-working-get-hillary-clinton-elected-silent-donation-according-leaked
Weatherman
2018-09-11 14:23:23 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
me wrote:
>
> https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-09-10/google-was-working-get-hillary-clinton-elected-silent-donation-according-leaked
>

If it's the Russian rag Zero Hedge, you know it's zero facts, comrade.
GLOBALIST
2018-09-11 14:34:14 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
On Tuesday, September 11, 2018 at 9:01:10 AM UTC-5, me wrote:
> https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-09-10/google-was-working-get-hillary-clinton-elected-silent-donation-according-leaked

==================================

This is exactly what President Trump was talking about a couple of weeks ago and our Spaniard boldly said: "President Trump doesn't know how Search engines work." Talk about Russian collusion.
--------------------


The lead author of the study, Dr. Robert Epstein, has previously conducted research into what he calls the Search Engine Manipulation Effect (SEME). This research showed that the manipulation of results pages in search engines can shift the voting preferences of undecideds by anywhere between 20 and 80 percent, depending on the demographic.

His latest research looks at how search engines can affect voters by suggesting negative or positive search terms when a political candidate’s name is entered into the search bar. Dr. Epstein’s research found that when negative search terms are suggested for a candidate, it can have a dramatic effect on voter opinion. -Breitbart
Weatherman
2018-09-11 14:40:39 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
GLOBALIST wrote:
> On Tuesday, September 11, 2018 at 9:01:10 AM UTC-5, me wrote:
>> https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-09-10/google-was-working-get-hillary-clinton-elected-silent-donation-according-leaked
>
> ==================================
>
> This is exactly what President Trump was talking about a couple of weeks ago and our Spaniard boldly said: "President Trump doesn't know how Search engines work." Talk about Russian collusion.
> --------------------
>
>
> The lead author of the study, Dr. Robert Epstein, has previously conducted research into what he calls the Search Engine Manipulation Effect (SEME). This research showed that the manipulation of results pages in search engines can shift the voting preferences of undecideds by anywhere between 20 and 80 percent, depending on the demographic.
>
> His latest research looks at how search engines can affect voters by suggesting negative or positive search terms when a political candidate’s name is entered into the search bar. Dr. Epstein’s research found that when negative search terms are suggested for a candidate, it can have a dramatic effect on voter opinion. -Breitbart
>

And the idiot quotes a source that's famous for LYING. No, you don't
know how search engines works and neither does Breitbart.
PJay OD
2018-09-11 14:46:37 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
On Tuesday, September 11, 2018 at 9:40:37 AM UTC-5, Weatherman wrote:
> GLOBALIST wrote:
> > On Tuesday, September 11, 2018 at 9:01:10 AM UTC-5, me wrote:
> >> https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-09-10/google-was-working-get-hillary-clinton-elected-silent-donation-according-leaked
> >
> > ==================================
> >
> > This is exactly what President Trump was talking about a couple of weeks ago and our Spaniard boldly said: "President Trump doesn't know how Search engines work." Talk about Russian collusion.
> > --------------------
> >
> >
> > The lead author of the study, Dr. Robert Epstein, has previously conducted research into what he calls the Search Engine Manipulation Effect (SEME). This research showed that the manipulation of results pages in search engines can shift the voting preferences of undecideds by anywhere between 20 and 80 percent, depending on the demographic.
> >
> > His latest research looks at how search engines can affect voters by suggesting negative or positive search terms when a political candidate’s name is entered into the search bar. Dr. Epstein’s research found that when negative search terms are suggested for a candidate, it can have a dramatic effect on voter opinion. -Breitbart
> >
>
> And the idiot quotes a source that's famous for LYING. No, you don't
> know how search engines works and neither does Breitbart.

"Study Reveals 90 Percent of Google Employee Political Contributions Went To Democrats"

you could google it to retrieve it
Weatherman
2018-09-11 14:52:37 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
PJay OD wrote:
> On Tuesday, September 11, 2018 at 9:40:37 AM UTC-5, Weatherman wrote:
>> GLOBALIST wrote:
>>> On Tuesday, September 11, 2018 at 9:01:10 AM UTC-5, me wrote:
>>>> https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-09-10/google-was-working-get-hillary-clinton-elected-silent-donation-according-leaked
>>>
>>> ==================================
>>>
>>> This is exactly what President Trump was talking about a couple of weeks ago and our Spaniard boldly said: "President Trump doesn't know how Search engines work." Talk about Russian collusion.
>>> --------------------
>>>
>>>
>>> The lead author of the study, Dr. Robert Epstein, has previously conducted research into what he calls the Search Engine Manipulation Effect (SEME). This research showed that the manipulation of results pages in search engines can shift the voting preferences of undecideds by anywhere between 20 and 80 percent, depending on the demographic.
>>>
>>> His latest research looks at how search engines can affect voters by suggesting negative or positive search terms when a political candidate’s name is entered into the search bar. Dr. Epstein’s research found that when negative search terms are suggested for a candidate, it can have a dramatic effect on voter opinion. -Breitbart
>>>
>>
>> And the idiot quotes a source that's famous for LYING. No, you don't
>> know how search engines works and neither does Breitbart.
>
> "Study Reveals 90 Percent of Google Employee Political Contributions Went To Democrats"
>
> you could google it to retrieve it
>

Algorithms don't vote or belong to a particular party, stupid traitor.
Loading...