Discussion:
WILFORD: New IRS Numbers Are In And They Look Bad For Gavin Newsom, Kathy Hochul And J.B. Pritzker
(too old to reply)
Telford
2023-05-13 04:54:21 UTC
Permalink
Demnocrats deserve every bad thing that happens to them.
The pandemic brought with it a great deal of changes. In many cases, this
included changes in scenery. Newly released IRS data shows that in the
first year of the pandemic, taxpayers fled high-tax states like New York
and California for low-tax states like Florida and Texas at an even faster
rate than before.

The IRS annually releases data on what states taxpayers moved to and from.
This data is delayed a few years, so the most recent release describes
where taxpayers moved to over the course of the first year of the
pandemic, in 2020.

It’s not a new phenomenon that New York and California have been
hemorrhaging taxpayers. The previous set of data, describing taxpayers’
moves in 2019, found that these two states combined to lose over 248,000
households and $37 billion in adjusted gross income (AGI) on net (moves
out after subtracting moves in).

But that went into overdrive in 2020, as millions of Americans found
themselves no longer expected — or able — to commute. In 2020, New York
and California combined to lose over 300,000 households and $53 billion in
AGI on net.

While not on the same scale as New York and California, the other big
losers from tax migration were exactly the states one might expect:
Illinois, Massachusetts, and New Jersey. In total, the ten biggest tax
migration losers lost over 430,000 households and $81.7 billion in AGI on
net.

But one state’s loss is another state’s gain — and in this case, that
“other state” is Florida. Florida gained over $39 billion in AGI on net
during 2020, more than the next nine biggest “winner” states combined.
Texas was the next biggest “winner,” gaining just under $11 billion in AGI
on net.

A clear theme among these winners and losers is that taxpayers fled to
greener tax pastures in 2020. The ten biggest tax migration “losers” had
an average of the 39th most taxpayer-friendly tax system, according to the
Tax Foundation’s State-Local Tax Burden rankings. The ten biggest
“winners,” on the other hand, averaged the 16th-most taxpayer-friendly tax
system.

Again using the Tax Foundation’s ranks, we can use the IRS’s data to see
how many moves in 2020 were tax-advantageous. Filtering out lateral moves
to a state with a roughly similar tax burden, more than 60 percent of
“tax-significant” moves in 2020 went to a better tax system. At the same
time, more than 70 percent of AGI involved in these “tax-significant”
moves went to a more taxpayer-friendly state.

Considering the multitude of reasons why Americans move, from work to
family to weather, that’s a very significant majority. Clearly, taxes are
not just one more consideration in Americans’ residency decisions — they
are often the primary one.

The obvious solution for these states that continue to see their residents
fleeing for lower-tax alternatives would be to restructure their tax
systems to be more competitive and less confiscatory. But as that is a
lesson that these states refuse to learn, taxpayers need to be aware of
their preferred solution — coming up with excuses to reach across their
borders to tax Americans in other states.

It’s great news that taxpayers are voting with their feet at greater rates
than ever before, and that the increasingly digitized economy is making
this possible. But real change won’t happen in the states taxpayers are
fleeing unless those states have no alternative but to fix their tax
systems.

Andrew Wilford is a senior policy analyst with the National Taxpayers
Union Foundation, a nonprofit dedicated to tax and fiscal policy research
and education at all levels of government.

<https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/opinion/wilford-new-irs-numbers-are-in-
and-they-look-bad-for-gavin-newsom-kathy-hochul-and-j-b-pritzker/ar-
AA1b7Tik?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=b81efb7c10e745c9a92e67961a3697cb&ei=13>
Reid Hoffman
2023-05-13 05:14:21 UTC
Permalink
I'll fuck Kamala before E. Jean Carroll.
The Hong Kong corporation that allegedly wired funds to Hunter Biden’s
business in 2017 was controlled by a Shanghai firm run by members of the
Chinese Communist Party (CCP), some of whom had previously served in the
People’s Liberation Army (PLA), according to business documents and
congressional reports reviewed by the Daily Caller News Foundation.

On June 30, 2017, Shanghai Huaxin Group (Hong Kong) Ltd. wired $10 million
to the Delaware-based company CEFC Infrastructure, which then wired
$100,000 to Hunter Biden’s “professional corporation,” Owasco P.C., on
August 4, 2017, a House Oversight Committee memo revealed Wednesday,
alleging the transfers were part of an influence peddling scheme.

However, at the time of the 2017 wire transfer, 100% of Shanghai Huaxin
Group (Hong Kong) Ltd.’s shares were held by a company called CEFC
Shanghai International Group Ltd., which was run by multiple members of
the CCP, according to a 2017 Shanghai stock exchange filing. (RELATED:
Hunter’s Chinese Business Partner ‘Attempted To Hide’ Payment From China-
Based Firm To Biden Family, Report Says)

CEFC Shanghai International Group Ltd. is also identified as the owner of
Shanghai Huaxin Group (Hong Kong) in a 2020 Senate Homeland Security
Committee report, which further characterized Shanghai Huaxin Group (Hong
Kong) as a Chinese “state-owned enterprise.” The report also noted that
CEFC Shanghai International Group Ltd. was “controlled” by Shanghai
Guosheng Group, “another state-owned enterprise.”

Furthermore, CEFC Shanghai International Group’s “director,” Su Weizhong,
whom the 2017 Shanghai stock exchange filing lists as one of its two
“actual controllers,” is a CCP member, according to the filings.

A 2017 Chinese government article also identified Su Weizhong as a member
of the “discipline inspection commission” at China Energy Fund Committee,
which was controlled by the CCP’s Discipline Inspection Commission,
according to an archived version of China Energy Fund Committee’s website.

The CCP tasks the Discipline Inspection Commission with “rooting out
wrongdoing among public servants” and “enforcing loyalty” to the Party
Central Committee and General Secretary Xi Jinping, according to a 2021
Congressional Research Service report concerning China’s political system.

CEFC Shanghai International Group’s other “actual controller,” Zheng
Xiongbin, is not listed as a CCP member by the 2017 filings.

However, CEFC Shanghai International Group’s “general manager” and “legal
representative,” Li Yong, is also listed as a CCP member in the filings
with the Shanghai stock exchange.

Several other “directors” and “supervisors” of CEFC Shanghai International
Group are also CCP members, according to the 2017 stock filing, including
“director” Chen Qiang, as well as “chief supervisor” Dong Jinqiang and
“supervisor” Xiong Fengsheng.

Additionally, Chen Qiang, Dong Jinqiang and Xiong Fengsheng are all listed
as having previously served in the PLA, according to the filing.

While Dong Jinqiang formerly served as the CCP party secretary at several
PLA posts, and Xiong Fengsheng previously served as president of a PLA
hospital, Chen Qiang served as a PLA commander in Nanjing before joining
CEFC Shanghai International Group, the stock filing states.

The House Oversight Committee’s Wednesday memorandum alleged that Hunter
Biden’s business partner, Gongwen “Kevin” Dong, orchestrated a complex
plot involving multiple intermediary companies to conceal Shanghai Huaxin
Group (Hong Kong) Ltd. as the original source of millions of dollars of
outbound cash — at least some of which ultimately made it to Hunter
Biden’s firm, according to the memo.

“Chinese nationals and companies with significant ties to Chinese
intelligence and the Chinese Communist Party hid the source of the funds
by layering domestic limited liability companies,” the memo stated.

The memo characterized Dong as the “emissary in the United States” for Ye
Jianming, the “chairman” of China Energy Fund Committee.

In addition to heading China Energy Fund Committee, Ye also served as the
“deputy secretary-general” of the China Association of International
Friendly Contact (CAIFC), according to the memo.

CAIFC is “an international outreach arm” for the People’s Liberation Army
as well as a “platform for deploying undercover intelligence gatherers,”
the memo stated.

In 2018, the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission described
CAIFC as performing “intelligence collection,” “propaganda” and
“perception management campaigns.”

Ye Jianming, who was arrested on bribery charges by Chinese authorities in
2018, allegedly used the China Energy Fund Committee to “bribe and
corruptly influence foreign officials,” according to the memo, which also
cited the 2019 international bribery and money laundering conviction of
China Energy Fund Committee employee Patrick Ho.

Ho was sentenced to three years in prison for two bribery schemes he
conducted against African government officials in New York, according to
the Department of Justice.

The House Oversight Committee report alleges that bank records for the
2017 wire transfers from Shanghai Huaxin Group (Hong Kong), CEFC
Infrastructure and Owasco P.C. “disproves President Biden’s claim that his
family received no money from China.”

The White House and Gongwen Dong did not respond immediately to the Daily
Caller News Foundation’s request for comment.

Hunter Biden and representatives from Shanghai Huaxin Group (Hong Kong)
Ltd. and CEFC Shanghai International Group Ltd. could not be reached for
comment.

<https://dailycaller.com/2023/05/12/ccp-hunter-biden-shanghai-transfers/>
Loading...